A year ago I was invited to speak, together with Emma Dent Coad and Matt Wrack, at the Labour Party Conference ‘Grenfell Never Again’ event hosted by the FBU.
The topic was what actions should the government take… I’m horrified at the lack of progress.
Here is what I said:
I am very humbled to be on this panel and want to thank the Fire Brigades Union for the invitation.
By way of introduction … Professionally I partner organisations in high hazard industries to create the leadership capabilities and culture to prevent catastrophic events. From 2011 to 2014 my husband and I rented a beautiful apartment on the 21st floor of Grenfell Tower. We fell in love with high rise living – with the views and community – and in 2014 purchased an apartment in Trellick Tower. Our view is of Grenfell. On the 14th June 2017 we watched it burn, 7 of our former neighbours died. As I watched the fire, I vowed to ensure we learned and to bring the thinking of high hazard industries to the Grenfell conversation.
Let me start by telling you a short story… During the Public Inquiry’s questioning of the firefighters, I was deeply upset by the amount of hindsight bias in the questioning.
Feeling helpless, I rang the bell at the Kensington fire station, a box of Golborne Road’s famous Portuguese custards tarts in hand… I shoved the box into the hands of the firefighter who opened the door, mumbled something about how upset I was and that I was thinking of them, gave him a hug and left…
I don’t really have the words to express this but I do want you to know that the Grenfell firefighters will always have my heart, my solidarity and my deepest gratitude.
The question I’ve been asked to speak to is – what actions must the government take to make buildings safe and ensure that a fire like the Grenfell Tower tragedy never happens again… From my perspective there are 4 actions that are currently not getting enough attention.
- Ensuring that the Inquiries recommendations are implemented and effective
- Creating a transparent national register of fire and safety risks
- Resourcing fixing safety critical issues
- Transforming how we think and lead.
In all honesty, history tells us we will not learn from Grenfell and we need to confront this learning disability. The dangers of external fire spread were discussed in Parliament almost 20 years before Grenfell.
- We didn’t learn from the death of Alexander Linton’s in 1999 in Garnock Court.
- We didn’t learn from the deaths of firefighters Michael Miller and Jeff Wornham in Harrow Court in 2005.
- We didn’t learn from the seven deaths in Lakanal House in 2009.
What makes us think we will learn from the 72 deaths at Grenfell?
A 2017 Institute for Government publication revealed that there is no process for ensuring recommendations from Inquiries or Inquests are either implemented or effective. Since 1990, there have been 68 public inquiries in the UK, and only 6 of these had full scrutiny to hold the government to account for what it did with the recommendations. Up to 2017, 639 million had been spent on the inquiries and yet there is no process in place to ensure recommendations implemented or effective!
So fundamentally, at a national level our ‘investigation system’ spends a lot of money coming up with recommendations, the sitting government can then either accept or reject them as they please, and there is no oversight or accountability process for ensuring that recommendations are either implemented or effective.
If we’re serious about preventing another Grenfell we need to establish an independent body to oversee the implementation and effectiveness of recommendations made by public inquiries and inquests and we need to start this with the Grenfell Inquiry.
Create a national safety risk register
Grenfell was not an isolated incident. It has revealed fatal failings in the housing and construction industry, in our understanding of risk and particularly the nature of low probability, high consequence events and severe failings in both regulations & regulators. Our buildings are full of materials whose risks are not known or understood. From cladding, to fire doors, to ventilation systems, to wet & dry risers, to missing or incorrectly installed fire breaks …
We are not building safe buildings and don’t appear to have been doing so for decades.
- A siloed and simplistic focus on cladding will not prevent the next Grenfell.
- An ostrich mentality hoping that luck will continue to play out as it has at Crewe, Barking, Worcester and Hackney will not prevent the next Grenfell.
- Another green or white paper or consultation will not prevent the next Grenfell.
- Another group of siloed industry and government experts talking behind closed doors will not prevent the next Grenfell.
Without confronting and owning how bad things are as the starting point, we stand no chance of preventing the next Grenfell.
It is absolutely inexcusable that 2 ½ years down the line we have not created a transparent national register of fire safety risks. How can we possibly hope to correct things if we don’t have oversight of what there is to correct?
Arguments against transparency rest in an outdated paternalistic notion that somehow residents or the public cannot cope with the truth. We have to stop infantilising people – they are not the problem; they are integral to the solution. Would you want to live in a building without knowing the risks you were facing?
The second action the government must take is creating a transparent national register of safety critical risks. This should start with the data from fire risk assessments in High Rise Buildings.
We need to figure out how to pay for putting things right. There is currently only government funding available for ACM cladding and I’m hearing reports of it being difficult to access. One large housing group estimates the costs of making its buildings safe at 6.9 billion. How to resource correcting things needs to be confronted.
It is predictable that large amounts of money will be spent in law courts which will take years to resolve. The very people in the building and construction industry who contributed to the problems we have will make a profit out of fixing things. An unfair burden will be placed on leaseholders and taxpayers.
Surely the insurance industry, central and local government, the building and construction industry and affected residents could find creative ways of funding repairs and ensure money goes towards fixing things rather than to lawyers or to the bottom line of large corporations that contributed to the problem in the first place.
We cannot expect fast paced change without confronting how it will be paid for. The government must find a way to resource mitigating and correcting historical failings. The solution must not place an unfair burden on leaseholders and taxpayers.
Transform how we lead.
Much attention is given to technical or structural solutions e.g. sprinklers, alarms, regulations. These are critical but we must understand that technical solutions alone will never prevent another Grenfell.
- Unless we understand the complexity of risk and particularly low probability high consequence risk, we will not prevent another Grenfell
- Unless we understand that human error is normal and that to rely on the lack of error to keep us safe is magical thinking, we will not prevent another Grenfell
- Unless we understand that in the complex world we live in, the expertise of those at the front line, of residents and the public is key to safe outcomes, we will not prevent another Grenfell.
- Unless we move from a blame to a learning narrative, we will not prevent another Grenfell.
These are all challenges of leadership. We need to engage and enquire into the kind of leadership that will prevent another Grenfell.
- We need to learn how to collaborate.
- We need to learn how to listen to diverse views.
- We need to learn how to engage in authentic enquiry.
We need to learn how to lead. Without transforming our leadership, we will not prevent another Grenfell.
I remember doing an interview for the Today Program just after the fire and talking about their being a choice in how we responded. Either the response would entrench existing views and divides, or it would create a new narrative. Of unity and togetherness. Of humanity.
There are two pictures I have in my head.
- The mass of outpouring of love and support in the days after Grenfell. You’d walk down and not be able to move. People of every race, creed, age, all coming together in love and solidarity.
- And the other one of the burning of the Grenfell effigy.
We cannot let this second picture win.
Ultimately Grenfell has entrenched existing views rather than enabled a new narrative. A narrative of love of unity and humanity. For me, this is the biggest failing of Grenfell and this is a failure of leadership, and we are all culpable.
This last week has shown political leaders from all parties displaying behaviours opposed to learning and enquiry, to humanity and compassion, to listening and decency. We stand no chance of preventing the next Grenfell without fundamentally altering how our political leaders behave. Without fundamentally transforming how we lead. And this needs to start with looking in the mirror before pointing fingers at others.
The fourth action, for all politicians, is to look long and hard in the mirror and confront how their leadership (or more accurately lack of it) has contributed to Grenfell. Without transforming how our politicians lead we stand no chance of preventing another Grenfell.
When good people do nothing bad things happen
Some useful links
The FBU published it’s booklet : The Grenfell Tower fire: a crime of profit and deregulation. It has incredibly useful information about the context and multiple failed opportunities to learn.
The following is a short article about the broader discussion at the event.